Stroke
Prevention and Therapy
4:00PM Patient Selection for Novel Stroke Therapy
Using Advance Imaging
Michael H. Lev, MD, Director, Emergency Neuroradiology and
Neurovascular Lab, Massachusetts General Hospital; Associate Professor of
Radiology, Harvard Medical School, mlev@partners.org
Moderator: David B. Hackney, MD, Professor of
Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Assistant Dean for Faculty Development,
Harvard Medical School, Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical
Center, dhackney@bidmc.harvard.edu
There are approximately 750,000 stroke
patients per year in the
The etiology of stroke is due to vascular injury
that is either hemorrhagic (15% of cases) or ischemic (85% of cases) in nature.
When a patient comes to the hospital suffering from an acute stroke, unenhanced
computed tomography (CT) is performed to exclude the possibility of bleeding in
the brain. If there is no evidence of
bleeding, then the patient is a candidate for IV-tPA. Traditionally, doctors have treated stroke
patients according to the adage, “Time is brain.” Lev proposes a more nuanced way of treating
patients, and he suggests the adage, “Mismatch is brain.” He advocates using advanced magnetic
resonance imaging (MRI) or CT imaging to determine how much of the brain is
already dead at admission and how much of the brain is at risk of dying if
there is no reperfusion. According to
these selection criteria, patients with little dead tissue and a lot of at-risk
tissue would be candidates to receive IV-tPA reperfusion therapy, even more
than three hours after stroke onset.
The mismatch between dead and dying tissue is
being used as a patient selection tool in a Phase Two trial of desmotoplase, a
clot-busting drug. Lev attributes some
promising results obtained in this study to the new method of patient
selection.
5:00PM New Perspectives in
the Imaging of Carotid Artery Plaque
Javier Romero, MD, Director, Ultrasound; Associate
Director, Neurovascular Laboratory; Staff Radiologist, Neuroradiology; Staff
Radiologist, Pediatric Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital; Instructor
Radiology, Harvard Medical School, rmromero@partners.org
Moderator: Rajiv Gupta, MD, Cardiac and Neuro Radiologist,
Massachusetts General Hospital, rgupta1@partners.org
Carotid
artery plaque raises one’s risk of stroke, but not all plaque is equally
dangerous. Vulnerable plaque can lead to
thrombosis (clotting of the artery) or to the formation of emboli (small clots)
that travel to the brain. The pathogenesis of stroke is
ischemic, or the result of plaque, in approximately 83% of cases. Studies have shown that fifty asymptomatic
patients with carotid artery stenosis (narrowing) of greater than 70% undergo
carotid endarterectomy (CEA), a plaque-removing procedure, to prevent one
stroke, for three years of follow-up. In
asymptomatic patients with carotid artery stenosis of 50-70%, the benefit of
CEA is less well understood. In the
future, imaging techniques could help doctors predict which people with
intermediate levels of stenosis will benefit most from surgery.
Multiple
techniques exist to assess unstable plaque.
These include
ultrasound, angiography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography
(CT), computerized tomographic angiography (CTA), positron emission tomography
(PET), and biochemical assays. A large
study utilizing ultrasound found that the presence of hypoechoic
(non-calcified) plaque and greater than 50% stenosis is connected to increased
stroke risk while hyperechoic (calcified) plaque is more stable. Interestingly, in coronary artery disease,
highly calcified plaque is associated with a high risk of symptoms while in
carotid artery disease, highly calcified plaque is associated with a low risk
of symptoms. Studies using MRI have
found that the presence of plaques with thin fibrous caps is correlated with
symptoms of transient ischemic attack (TIA) and stroke. Biochemical studies done in rabbits fed high
cholesterol diets have shown that the enzyme myeloperoxidase, which activated
macrophages and neutrophils secrete in response to inflammation, is also
secreted by vulnerable plaque prone to rupture.
The
lab of Javier Romero is studying the ability of CTA to provide information
about plaque vulnerability. Patients
with enhancement on CTA of the vasa vasorum (a network of small arterioles, capilllaries,
and venules that supply the outer tissues of large blood vessels) at the carotid
bifurcation appear more likely to be symptomatic. Romero’s group also compared symptomatic and
asymptomatic patients and found that the asymptomatic patients had denser, more
calcified plaques than symptomatic patients, a finding that corroborates
previous ultrasound data. Plaque density
may be a surrogate marker of plaque stability and a potential way to determine
whether an asymptomatic patient with carotid artery stenosis should undergo
surgical treatment.